08:00
Making equity a first-class concern of epidemiological model(er)s.
CDC U01 Site Visit
Jon Zelner
[email protected]
Dept. of Epidemiology
Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health
University of Michigan School of Public Health
EpiBayes Research Group
epibayes.io
Introductions
What does it mean to model for equity?
Lunch 🥪
Short talks/discussion on respiratory infection equity work
“Racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality are driven by unequal infection risks.” (CID, 2021)
“There are no equal opportunity infectors” (PLOS Comp. Bio, 2022)
“Modeling rates of disease with missing categorical data.” (Annals of Applied Statistics, Forthcoming)
Ask questions that foreground macro-structural mechanisms and power differentials.
Collect data that are up to the task of answering these question.
Construct models that examine potential impacts of socio-structural change on disease even if these changes don’t correspond to a formal policy or intervention.
COVID-19 disparities are not the fault of those who are experiencing them, but rather reflect social policies and systems that create health disparities in good times and inflate them in a crisis. The US must develop a new kind of “herd immunity,” whereby resistance to the spread of poor health in the population occurs when a sufficiently high proportion of individuals, across all racial, ethnic, and social class groups, are protected from and thus “immune” to negative social determinants.
From Williams & Cooper, “COVID-19 and Health Equity—A New Kind of “Herd Immunity”, JAMA, 6/23/2020
Flow diagram of connections between high-level, structural causes, intervening mechanisms, and downstream exposure risks, from (1)
Theoretical diagram from (2) showing the complex relationship between racism, socioeconomic inequity and racial inequity in disease outcomes.
Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 deaths potentially averted in 2020 if all Michiganders experienced the same pacing of SARS-CoV-2 infection as Whites (From Naraharisetti et al., Under Review)
Some goal-setting questions can be found in this google doc. Specifically:
What do you see as key conceptual challenges in going from theory to useful models of infection inequity?
What are the data gaps that need to be closed? How close-able are they?
What are some of the organizational or institutional impediments to making necessary change?
Anything else?
08:00
Models that encode biased assumptions may be worse than those that ignore equity altogether.
Nonexistent data on individual socioeconomic status in most public health surveillance data.
Datasets are plagued by missingness of key socio-demographic covariates. (3)
Career/funding incentives have not been well-aligned.
Modelers from marginalized backgrounds remain underrepresented.