PUBHLTH 405
Social Epidemiology of Infectious Disease
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Jon Zelner
[email protected]
epibayes.io
What is a fundamental cause and how is it different from a plain-old cause?
How do we understand health (in)equity and why does it matter?
How do these concepts relate to the problem of infectious disease transmission and illness progression?
Mental model about the generation of health inequalities as a function of high-level risks like socioeconomic status (SES) and racism.
Focuses on how upstream determinants put individuals at risk of risks.
Important for understanding how health inequities cluster in populations and geographic locations.
Prioritizes structural over individualistic explanations.
A cluster of flexible resources that individuals can marshal to their advantage:
Income & Wealth
Education & access to information
Class privilege (e.g. the “hidden curriculum”) navigating social and medical settings
Social relationships that may provide “insider” access
Impacts multiple more-proximal risks for disease at the same time.
Consequently, also likely to drive risk across multiple health outcomes.
The cause itself is related to the ability to access resources that allow one to avoid an illness or mitigate its impacts.
Critically: Association persists even when proximal mechanisms are addressed, because they are replaced by new ones.
It’s easy to mistake the POSIWID view of the world for a slightly tiresome kind of cynicism. To say that the purpose of the system is what it does isn’t to make any statement about the intentions of the people working for it. The danger of confusing the properties of the system with those of its members is one of the most important reasons for not opening up a black box. Unfortunately, it’s a very common confusion; very few people are able to take a step back, view their own organisation as if from outside, and realise that they are structurally producing results which are exactly the opposite of what they had intended. (Davies 2024, 53)
Why can’t socioeconomic status explain all race/ethnic health inequities?
Differential quality of medical treatment.
Differential access to health-promoting environments.
Employment and housing discrimination.
Emotional and physical stress resulting from prolonged exposure to discrimination.
Residential segregation
Social stigma
Racial capitalism (Laster Pirtle 2020)
What else?
Open up this document
Going to spend ~15m on your group’s question.
We will then split into groups with 2-3 “experts” from each original group and review, discuss, and edit the answers of the original group.
After everyone has done all of these, we’ll come back and discuss these in the context of the readings.
When new tools and technologies are available for prevention and treatment, they are first available to the most-privileged.
This introduces or increases inequity in outcomes at first.
Over time, the tool becomes available to more people and inequity decreases.
Over time, the innovation saturates the population and inequality stabilizes or disappears.
What interventions or policies might explain this pattern?