05:00
PUBHLTH 405
Social History of Infectious Disease
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Jon Zelner
[email protected]
epibayes.io
“Particularly with regard to consumption it must be remembered that Negroes are not the first people who have been claimed as its peculiar victims; the Irish were once thought to be doomed by that disease - but that was when Irishmen were unpopular.” -W.E.B. Du Bois, The Philadelphia Negro, 1899
Finishing up discussion of initial chapters
Digesting Chapters 3 & 4 (35m)
A little more detail about residential segregation.
Preview of next time.
Malaria 1
Plague 1
Polio 1
STIs
Malaria 2
Plague 2
Polio 2
“Racial residential (i.e., housing) segregation is one of the most pervasive patterns in American metropolitan areas and a powerful engine of racial stratification. Whites and blacks are separated into different residential neighborhoods with markedly different resources to support health and well-being over the life course.” (Acevedo-Garcia and Osypuk 2008)
At a general level, residential segregation is the degree to which two or more groups live separately from one another, in different parts of the urban environment. This general understanding masks considerable underlying complexity, however, for groups may live apart from one another and be “segregated” in a variety of ways. (Massey and Denton 1988)
Some canonical definitions from (Massey and Denton 1988):
“They may be spatially centralized, congregating around the urban core, and occupying a more central location than the majority.”
“[A]reas of minority settlement may be tightly clustered to form one large contiguous enclave, or be scattered widely around the urban area.”
Do any of these describe the patterns of segregation described in Infectious Fear?
(Grigoryeva and Ruef 2015) define three types of segregation:
Classic approach, e.g. (Massey and Denton 1988), only captures primary segregation.
Grigoryeva & Ruef noticed that information could be extracted from the order in which 19th century census takers visited houses. (Grigoryeva and Ruef 2015)
Data were recorded sequentially in their records as they went 🏠 to 🏠.
Compared observed sequences of black and white households to a random distribution to measure the extent of tertiary segregation.
Called their measure the Sequential Index of Segregation (SIS)
What do you think this implies for how we should approach the measurement/characterization of segregation?
Spend a few minutes on your own, thinking about and adding a quick response to what struck you most about the readings.
Pair up and discuss the next question.
Join pairs into groups of 4 for the next discussion.
Groups of 6-8 for final question.
Spend a few minutes going back over the text and put your answers to these questions in this google doc:
What is Roberts referring to when he describes the landscape of health in Chapter 3?
What were you most confused or surprised about in these chapters?
What struck you as most important?
05:00
Focusing on Chapter 3, what does the discussion in this chapter add to our understanding of how segregation and racism act as fundamental causes of health inequality?
What other diseases - infectious and non-communicable - were linked to racial residential segregation and living conditions during the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
How does this information support - or not - the role of racism and SES as fundamental causes in TB disparities?
08:00
What are the push and pull factors that Roberts invokes to exlpain the emergence of the Druid Hill Corridor as a Black ghetto characterized by intense segregation and high rates of TB and other infectious diseases?
In chapter 4, what similarities and differences did you see been infected house theory and the miasmatic theories discussed in The Ghost Map?
10:00
Return to your initial reflections:
What emerged from your conversations that added to your understanding or thoughts about these chapters?
What do you remain confused or unsure about?
Drop a comment on any items you think have been resolved/added to through your discussions.
05:00
Putting ✨ finishing touches ✨ on your project whitepapers due 10/16.
Warning
This will be time for finishing, rather than starting. In an ideal world, your paper will be good enough to hand in when you get to class, but really clean and polished by the end of class!