PUBHLTH 405
Social History of Infectious Disease
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Jon Zelner
[email protected]
epibayes.io
Recapping Episode 6 of Fiasco (~10m)
Reading the original ‘Patient Zero’ analysis like it’s 1984 (~20m)
From Patient O \(\to\) Patient 0 (~45m)
We’re going to spend some quality time with this paper and pretend it’s still 1984
Worried that the mainstream media might not give coverage to Shilts’s popular history, his editor at St. Martin’s Press, Michael Denneny, approved a bold publicity strategy. He focused on Shilts’s identification of Dugas as “Patient Zero” and the flight attendant’s conflicts with physicians and public health officials, sensing that the salacious story the journalist had created would prove irresistible. (From (McKay 2014))
His hunch was accurate: the New York Post’s headline on October 6, 1987, epitomized the media’s response and characterized the popular memory of Gaétan Dugas from that point on. “the man who gave us aids” read the front page, claiming that Dugas “triggered ‘gay cancer’ epidemic in U.S.”76 Other publications drew upon the frequently rehearsed narrative of a disease introduced from abroad by a foreigner. “Canadian Said to Have Had Key Role in Spread of AIDS,” wrote the New York Times, while the National Review nicknamed Dugas “the Columbus of AIDS.” (McKay 2014)
60 Minutes, 1987
From a documentary about the 1983 Vancouver AIDS conference
Map and phylogenetic tree of early HIV-1 sequences from (Worobey et al. 2016)
Fiasco Episodes 6 & 7
The emergence of robust AIDS activism
Arrival of effective anti-HIV drugs